CoreCited · Compare
Otterly.AI vs Peec AI
Both track whether AI engines mention your brand. They differ sharply on price, engine coverage and whether they tell you what to do about it. Every figure below was read from each vendor's own pricing page on — blog roundups in this category get this wrong more often than they get it right.
Otterly.AI
Peec AI
Entry price
$29/mo
Not published
Free option
Free trial only. There is no free tier, despite what several blog roundups claim. Trial only
No free plan and no trial stated on their pricing page. (Blog claims of a 'free starter plan' were refuted.) No free option
Engines
ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot
Multiple
Prompts
15 (Lite)
Not published
Action layer
Limited — GEO audit, SWOT.
None.
What the headline price hides
Otterly.AI: $29 Lite gets you 15 prompts. The API and MCP server only begin at the $189 Standard tier.
Peec AI: Four paid tiers. We are not quoting a number: the widely-repeated €89 figure failed verification against their own page, and we won't publish a price we haven't read ourselves.
Otterly.AI
Strengths
- ✓The cheapest credible entry point in the category, and their ~5-minute onboarding is genuinely their most-praised feature.
- ✓Net Sentiment Score and a real GEO audit at a low price.
Gaps
- ✕15 prompts on the entry plan is very tight — most brands have more buyer questions than that.
- ✕A steep jump from $29 to $189 for the next tier.
- ✕No Claude tracking.
Peec AI
Strengths
- ✓Their data fidelity is the real differentiator: they collect via real-browser UI scraping rather than APIs, which is closer to what a human actually sees.
- ✓Unlimited seats on all tiers; 115+ languages.
- ✓Reached ~$4M ARR in 10 months — the market clearly rates them.
Gaps
- ✕No action layer at all — measurement only. Users report the real value comes from exporting and analysing the data yourself.
What neither of them will tell you
Both report AI visibility as a single confident number. But AI citations churn — SISTRIX measured 56% weekly source churn across 82,619 prompts. So a large share of the week-to-week movement in either dashboard is noise, and neither tool separates the noise from the signal, or tells you whether you hold a durable position or merely rotated through this week.
Where CoreCited is different
1. We tell you if you're in the core, or just the carousel
AI answers churn — SISTRIX measured 56% weekly source churn in Google AI Mode across 82,619 prompts. But the same study found that 86.5% of prompts keep a stable core of 1–5 names that persist week after week, while ~89% of everything else rotates. So "am I mentioned?" is close to a coin flip. The question that matters is whether you're in the durable core or the churn. No other tool distinguishes these.2. We show you the error bars, and grey out the noise
Share of voice is estimated from a finite sample, so it carries sampling error. On a realistic sample, brands sitting at 27%, 25% and 22% are statistically indistinguishable — their confidence ranges overlap completely. Every other dashboard renders that as a confident 1–2–3 ranking. We mark it as a tie and tell you not to act on it.3. We tell you when the fix didn't work
Mark a content brief published and we snapshot where you stand, then measure whether it actually moved you — and we'll say "no movement" or "you slipped" when that's the truth. A loop that can only report success is marketing, not measurement.Compare something else
How we sourced this: every price and limit above was read from the vendor's own pricing page in July 2026 — not from a roundup article. We checked, and blog roundups in this category get it wrong more often than not. Vendors change pricing frequently, so verify before you buy: otterly.ai · peec.ai. Spotted something out of date? Tell us and we'll fix it.